THE IMPACT OF NON-NATIVE ENGLISH ON OMISSIONS IN SIMULTANEOUS INTERPRETING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Emphasize is known to cause comprehension trouble, but experimental deciphering thinks about its particular effect has been scattered. Concurring with Mazzetti (1999), an emphasis is composed on digressed phonemics and prosody, both talked about broadly within the TESL teach. The current study seeks to look at, within the translating setting, the pertinence of Anderson-Hsieh, Johnson, and Koehler's (1992) finding that veering off prosody ruins comprehension more than tricky phonemics and syllable structure do. Thirty-seven graduate-level translating majors, doled out arbitrarily to four bunches, rendered four adaptations of a text perused by the same speaker and after that filled out a survey whereas playing back their possess versions.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Hallé, P. A., Best, C. T., & Levitt, A. (1999). Phonetic vs. phonological influences on French listeners' perception of American English approximants. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 281-306.
Hardison, D. M. (2004). Generalization of computer-assisted prosody training: Quantitative and qualitative findings. Language Learning & Technology, 9(1), 34-52.
Ingram, J. C. L., & Park, S.-G. (1998). Language, context, and speaker effects in the identification and discrimination of English /r/ and /l/ by Japanese and Korean listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(1), 1-14.
Jones, R. (1998). Conference interpreting explained. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.
Ladefoged, P. (2001). A course in phonetics. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers. Lambert, S. (1988). Information processing among conference interpreters: A test of the depth-of-processing hypothesis. Meta: Translators' Journal, 33(3), 377-387. Lee, S., & Cho, M. (2002). Sound replacement in the acquisition of English consonant clusters: A constraint-based approach. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology, 8(2), 255-271.