DEVELOPMENT OF 6-7-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN'S UNDERSTANDING OF ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS THROUGH AN ELECTRONIC PLATFORM BASED ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENCE

To'xtamishova Gulnora

Authors

To'xtamishova Gulnora Bukhara State University, Graduate Student of the 1st Stage.

Keywords:

Elementary mathematics, Interactive intelligence, Electronic platform, Math games, Child development, Learning outcomes, Educational technology, Early childhood education.

Abstract

This study investigates the development of 6-7-year-old children's understanding of elementary mathematics through an electronic platform based on interactive intelligence. The research explores how interactive intelligence within the electronic platform enhances children's engagement and learning outcomes in math. By analyzing the effectiveness of interactive math games tailored to this age group, the study aims to contribute to our understanding of how technology can support mathematical education in early childhood.

References

Hsieh, C. H., & Cuthbert, A. (2018). The impact of educational technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Information and Learning Science, 119(3/4), 128-137.

Lee, J., & Wong, K. W. (2020). Understanding the gamification of education: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 25(6), 4953-4978.

Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 37-76). Kluwer Academic.

Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2004). Building blocks for early childhood mathematics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 99-120.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the Building Blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163.

Manches, A., & Price, S. (2017). Digital technology and mathematics education: From practice to research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(4), 892-896.