CULTURE SHOCK, SELF-PRESERVATION IN INTERNATIONAL CULTURE

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Jan 12, 2024
Keywords:
intercultural communication, culture shock, adaptation, integration, cultural distance, «alien» culture.

Main Article Content

Gavxar Xaydarova
Student, Chirchik State Pedagogical University
Nurmanova Madina Lapasovna
Student, Chirchik State Pedagogical University
Uzoqboyeva Ra'no Anvarjon qizi
Scientific adviser, Chirchiq state pedagogical University

Abstract

The article analyzes the wonder of culture stun (social weakness), confronted by nearly each individual within the interaction with the unused culture. The creator presents the characteristics of the most shapes of social stun, its causes and indications. The article portrays the improvement stages of culture stun: special night, «grinding», «reintegration», «neutrality», «comfort», conjointly U-shaped and W-shaped show adaptation. The article analyzes the internal (personal) factors that affect the strength of the symptoms of culture shock and the duration of intercultural adaptation: age, gender, education, personality traits of the person, life experience, motivation, and external (group) factors: cultural distance, the features of the native culture of the migrant and other. The author discusses ways of conduct in order to prevent or reduce the duration of culture shock: ghettoizing, assimilation, interaction, partial assimilation. In conclusion, in this problem, the author summarizes the results concerning the current areas of research of culture shock.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gavxar Xaydarova, Nurmanova Madina Lapasovna, & Uzoqboyeva Ra’no Anvarjon qizi. (2024). CULTURE SHOCK, SELF-PRESERVATION IN INTERNATIONAL CULTURE. Proceedings of International Conference on Modern Science and Scientific Studies, 3(1), 63–69. Retrieved from https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/icmsss/article/view/3609
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): SCMS
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Grishaeva L. I. Vvedenie v teoriiu mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii [Introduction to the theory of intercultural communication]. Voronezh,VGU Publ.,2004.369p.

Grushevitskaia T. G. Osnovy mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii [Foundations of intercultural communication]. Moscow, UNITY Publ.,2002. 352

Korsini R. Psikhologicheskaia entsiklopediia (Encyclopedia of Psychology)Available at: http://dic.academic.ru/contents.nsf/enc_psychology/ (accessed 11 Oktober 2014)

Leontovich O. A. Rossiia i SShA: vvedenie v mezhkul'turnuiu Kommunikatsiiu [Russia and the United States: an introduction to intercultural communication]. Volgograd, Peremena Publ., 2003. 399 p.

Persikova T. N. Mezhkul'turnaia kommunikatsiia i korpora-tivnaia Kul'tura [Intercultural communication and corporate culture]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2002. 224 p.

Piterova A. Iu. Osobennosti mezhkul'turnoi kommunikatsii [Features of intercultural communication]. Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i Obrazovaniia – Almanac of Modern Science and Education, 2010, no. 1. P. 2, pp. 75-79

Sadokhin A. P. Kul'turologiia. Teoriia kul'tury [Cultural studies. Theory of culture]. Moscow, IuNITI-DANA Publ., 2004. 365 p.

Gritsanov A.A., Abushenko V.L., Evel'kin G.M. Sotsiologiia: Entsiklopediia

[Sociology: An Encyclopedia]. Available at: http://voluntary.ru/dictionary/568/word/kulturnyi-shok (accessed 15 Oktober 2014)

Stefanenko, T. G. Etnopsikhologiia [Ethnopsychology]. Moscow, Akademicheskii proekt Publ., 1999. 320 p.

Adler P.S. The transitional experience: An alternative view of culture shock. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, Vol 15(4). NY, 1975, pp. 3-23.

Bock P.K. Psychological Anthropology. Westport, Conn. Praeger, 1994.

Oberg K. Practical Anthropology. New Mexico, 1960.