BALANCING POWER: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE JUDICIARY AND PARLIAMENT ACROSS DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS

Article Sidebar

pdf
Published: Jun 13, 2023
Keywords:
Judiciary, Parliament, Interdependence, Global perspective, International Standards, Parliamentary Sovereignty, Judicial Review, Democratic Balance, Constitutional Custodianship, Judicial Activism.

Main Article Content

Kholmatov Yulchi Abjalil ogli
Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent city Tashkent State Law University Master's degree and part-time education Advocacy course 1st year student

Abstract

This extensive article dives deep into the multifaceted relationship between the Judiciary and Parliament. By drawing from diverse global experiences and international standards, we aim to shed light on the delicate balance of power and mutual interactions that underpin the proper functioning of democratic systems. The article examines the roles, responsibilities, powers, challenges, controversies, and debates that shape these two pillars of democracy.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kholmatov Yulchi Abjalil ogli. (2023). BALANCING POWER: A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE JUDICIARY AND PARLIAMENT ACROSS DEMOCRATIC SYSTEMS. Proceedings of International Conference on Modern Science and Scientific Studies, 2(6), 54–58. Retrieved from https://econferenceseries.com/index.php/icmsss/article/view/2241
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): ICMSSS
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

Bickel, A. M. (1962). The Least Dangerous Branch: the Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Bobbs-Merrill.

Griffith, J. A. G. (2001). The Politics of the Judiciary. Manchester University Press.

Hirschl, R. (2004). Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Harvard University Press.

Kommers, D. P., & Miller, R. A. (2012). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Duke University Press.

Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.

Rosenberg, G. N. (2008). The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? University of Chicago Press.

Russell, M. (2001). Building New Labour: The Politics of Party Organisation. Palgrave.

Stone Sweet, A. (2000). Governing with Judges: Constitutional Politics in Europe. Oxford University Press.

Tushnet, M. (2005). The New Constitutional Order. Princeton University Press.

Waldron, J. (2006). The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review. Yale Law Journal, 115(6), 1346-1406.

Whittington, K. E. (2007). Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U.S. History. Princeton University Press.

Venice Commission (2010). Report on the Rule of Law. Study No. 512 / 2009. Strasbourg: European Commission For Democracy Through Law (Venice Commission).

Bhatia, G. (2016). The Transformative Constitution. HarperCollins.