SERIOTYPES OF COMMUNICATIVE BEHAVIOR IN GENDER LINGUISTICS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article discusses the basics of gender linguistics and the differences between men's and women's speech.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
References
Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 83-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Taylor, S. E., & Crocker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793. Taynor, J., & Deaux, K.. (1973). When women are more deserving than men: Equity, attribution, and perceived sex differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 360-367. Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole. Upshaw, H. S. (1969). The personal reference scale: An approach to social judgment. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 315-371. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (1980). Perspectives on working women: A databook (Bulletin 2080). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1982). Measuring sex stereotypes: A thirty-nation study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Attribution of success and failure revisited, or: The motivational bias is alive and well in attribution theory. Journal of Personality, 47, 245-287. Received March 28, 1983 Revision received November 9, 1983 New Journal on Aging: Cal